The psychology of online shopping: Are you a slave to the technology?

Quick answer… more than likely, although you would never admit it.

selective focus photography of woman holding black cased smartphone near assorted clothes

Photo by mentatdgt on

Online shopping has revolutionised the way we buy so many day-to-day items. The online world has so infiltrated the way we shop, that for the most part, we simply don’t realise how ubiquitous it is.

Whether it’s jumping on to the Myer website for the Black Friday sales, buying a digital subscription on Spotify, catching an Uber, downloading a movie from Google Play, choosing your seats for the theatre and then collecting your tickets at the box office, ordering and then getting your pizza or burger delivered by Deliveroo, or buying our coffee beans from our favourite Single Origin provider, nearly all of us at some point are using the online environment to buy a good or a service. Australia is currently the 10th largest e-commerce market in the world by revenue. E-commerce in Australia will continue to grow. The market size is estimated to be A$35.2 billion (US$ 25.2 billion) by 2021, but this probably only represents the tip of the online iceberg.

The online world has completely changed the way that we transact, but we are mostly unaware of the manipulations going on in the background that influence how we respond to a whole range of stimuli that tap into our psychological vulnerabilities.

One of the most critical elements of the online experience is how quickly we move through the online environment as opposed to, perhaps, a bricks-and-mortar or traditional face-to-face context. Whenever we shop or even make a choice, marketers work hard to activate our automatic and emotional brain, rather than rational brain, and sadly, our evolutionary biology is a bit of an ally in this endeavour. It requires significant energy to fire up the pre-frontal cortex (the thinking brain), so to conserve energy we tend to feel first, and ask (rational) questions later (if at all).

Although it may sound like an oversimplification, we are making thousands of decisions and choices throughout the day. If most of our decision-making happens automatically and emotionally, our rational brain tends to assume that we are making reasonable decisions and therefore accepts them without too much debate, mostly to manage our very fragile ego (nobody wants to feel that they are a bad decision-maker).

The issue here though—and it’s important to understand this – is that it doesn’t necessarily mean that a particular stimuli will work on every person who is exposed to a it. Any kind of stimuli, such as an ad or even a suggestion from a friend, will work on people who are open to that message and are goal-oriented—they need to actually want the product that the stimuli is connected to, even though they may not be consciously aware that they want it.

There is strong psychological evidence that once someone makes a commitment to a goal – even a goal as simple as “I quite like that luggage/dress/cologne” – it is quite difficult to “undo” that goal.

From a marketer’s point of view, the key is to get a potential customer to achieve that goal as quickly as possible. You don’t want distractions. For the most part, anybody who clicks though an Instagram story to an advertisement has already committed to at least considering the purchase. The marketer aim is to then move you to the handing over of your hard-earned cash as quickly as possible. That’s why they want you to log on; if they have your details (perhaps including your credit card details from a previous purchase), they can get you through to the purchase in as little as two or three clicks.

The other element that is hidden from our view is the ability for organisations, even small organisations with small capacities, to use sophisticated analytical technology to adapt and change the offer as they learn about consumer behaviour. As an example, in the gambling industry, the artificial intelligence (AI) adapts the offer as the technology learns what consumers are responding to and not responding to.

In the past, if researchers wanted to learn about consumer behaviour, they would have had to run experiments, usually by gathering a whole bunch of students in a classroom for credit and getting them to do participate in the study. Now businesses can conduct experiments online very quickly, without you knowing and without having to go through an ethics process or have their research scrutinised by experts.

When you click “I agree” to the terms and conditions on a site, you are most probably also saying yes to being a psychological guinea pig for a whole bunch of data collection and analysis that will refine how you, and future customers, respond to psychological stimuli. And the return on investment from the business is good because you can conduct experiments very cheaply online.

One factor that is rarely considered is the issue of decision-making asymmetry in the online world. People talk a lot about information asymmetry – the idea that the business has more information about you and how you behave, than you have about them – but often what is overlooked is a significant psychological power imbalance between the customer and the business in relation to decision-making, which is assisted by the information asymmetry.

So, you may think that it’s a level playing field, but behind the screen (or in the cloud), a whole bunch of unfair processes are taking place, that know your next move, usually before you do.

So, what can you do?

It’s tricky, because millennia of evolution have informed the dominance of using our emotions to make critical decisions. In the past (and even now) there are times when we need to make a quick, emotional decision, particularly if there is danger present. Our definition of danger has evolved as our response to it has not. In other words, danger millenia ago was being eaten by a tiger near our home, but in the contemporary world, missing out on a great product or service that will give us some social capital is more likely to represent something that we fear. Undoing that is not as simple as we might think.

However, there are a few ways we can combat our evolutionary predispositions.

If you don’t want to fall prey to the danger of shopping online (and I am not saying that all online shopping is dangerous), the key is to activate your thinking brain (which isn’t as easy as you think).

The first thing is to slow the process down.

One way to do this is to force yourself to log on every time you go to a website. Clear your cookies regularly. Log off sites. Don’t let them keep your credit card details for future purchases. We have been so captured by this idea of “convenience”, that we don’t realise how we have become fodder for online sales processes. Convenience manifests online as speed, and speed (as I mentioned earlier) is the friend of a marketer.

The next thing is to ask yourself is why you’re shopping at all. Have you responded to an online advertisement? Prior to seeing the advertisement were you thinking about buying the product? Does this product offer better value (for money, for joy, for your life, for the world) than what you already have?

A boring (and probably very inconvenient) technique is to journal all the online purchases you’ve made over the past month or so. This could be buying a good, a service, a subscription, anything where you had to use a computer, a tablet, or an app on your smart phone. This is a useful way to audit how much online shopping you really do. Then ask yourself the question, “Am I happy with that purchase?”

Try to be aware of how online marketing could be influencing you (without you knowing). Simply reading this article may assist you to think more about what is influencing your decision making. But don’t get complacent. Information and decision-making asymmetry will always be ahead of you, despite what your supportive ego tells you about your ability to resist the marketers.

We are trying to constantly understand how we can have a happier life, a better life, and a more convenient life, and marketing is very clever at reminding us how easy it is to buy things to achieve this (whether it’s true or not).

So, to put the brakes on, simply add the item/s to your wish list or cart for later — that way you can sleep on it and figure out whether you want the item at all.

Finally, it pays to have a plan before you shop online. Make a list of what you want, set yourself limits, and know when to close the tab. Shopping online is like shopping at the supermarket; if you don’t have a shopping list, you are going to be more susceptible to the clever nudges that marketers know work.

Online shopping is here to stay, but with a few simple techniques, you can put yourself in, at least, a better position to combat your evolutionary predispositions, and resist the manipulations of those predispositions to your advantage.

This article was first published at FinderX.

This entry was posted in Advertising, Consumer Behavior, Human Behavior, Research, Social Psychology. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s